NWOTCA

Meeting Date:  3/9/2010

 

Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at the Whitehouse Municipal building at 9:40 A.M.

 

Updates on legislation/OML seminar

Legislation

On 1/26/2010, a group from municipal tax met with the Ohio Society of CPAs on their many concerns with municipal tax.  Their list of issues are:  Consolidated returns, 2106 filings, certification of tax administrators, third-party sick pay, the 12 day rule, the appeals process, lottery winnings treatment, uniformity for penalty and interest, net operating loss standards, mandatory filings, and health savings account/health insurance taxability. The OSCPA wants legislation and it could take the form of attachments where there would not be any hearings or input before it is passed.  There will be an April gathering to discuss these further.  The OSCPA is threatening forcing the opening of ORC 718 if they don’t get some movement on these issues. 

Angie expressed concern at the meeting that the cities statewide were not appraised these issues were getting stirred up again. 

 

OML

The OML meeting of 2/12/2010 had as guest speaker Joe Zapotosky of the Ohio Business Gateway.  Joe explained updates and changes to the system.  The municipal section is about one third of the system bringing in 6.8% of the total.

New services are focused on security features and streamlining the system for consistency throughout on behalf of preparers using the Gateway for various filings.  Bulk filing will be in place in 2011 for payroll companies to download municipal filings into the system.  They are also working to support a document imaging system. 

Joe also spoke on the Finder system for updating addresses throughout.  There have been numerous errors and getting the errors corrected has been difficult.  Deb Cartledge of Maumee said their JEDDs are not properly listed and Angie agreed that the OBG knows JEDDs are a problem on Finder. 

The OML Seminar will be discussed at the next meeting scheduled for 3/12/2010.

 

Other

It was agreed to move the May NWOTCA meeting in Archbold to May 18th to follow the May OML meeting for timely updates of issues discussed. 

 

New Business

Guest speaker Michael Burke of Scheer, Green and Burke, LPA began discussions on the collections process their firm follows for collections of tax debt. 

Initial letters are issued to comply with fair debt collections standards and confirm accuracy of address information.  Further research is used to locate taxpayers when there is no positive response.  Second letters are sent before legal actions (law suit after 28 days if no response) are taken.  The third step would be the filing of a law suit appropriate for debt to be collected.  Collection letters include an itemized statement of the balance due. 

Law suits filed in municipal court would be in the municipality where the taxpayer resides.  Amounts due over $15,000.00 go to common pleas court.  Most collections cases are not contested and will receive a default judgment.  If the case is contested, trial is scheduled 20 to 90 days after contested filing.  One of the attorneys from the firm will appear in court to represent the municipality.  Consent agreements can be entered into at any time.  The taxpayer agrees to pay the amount due and a payment plan is entered into.  A judgment allows the use of the courts to seize assets.  The paycheck of a debtor is considered an asset and can be seized through a wage garnishment.  The taxpayer is informed of such15 days prior to the filing.  A wage garnishment can last up to 6 months or until the debt is paid.  When multiple wage garnishments are filed on a single debtor, only one is permitted at a time; the remaining garnishments are then stacked.  A wage garnishment can last longer than 6 months if the balance is not paid and there are no other garnishments waiting.  Wage garnishments are always taken after standard tax deductions but before other deductions.  Court costs are added to the debtors balance as well as court allowed interest (per state rates).  There is no dollar limit on garnishments (except for allowable % per check) and they apply state wide.  Suits can be filed locally and then transferred to the resident’s municipal court.  Even large judgments from common pleas can be transferred to the municipal court for a wage garnishment.  Wage garnishment is the most effective asset seizure. 

Bank account garnishes can also be used.  The first $400.00 in the account is exempt and funds from exempt sources like Social Security are also prohibited from seizure.  The debtor can file a claim of exempt funds within a week of notification with bank statements reflecting the exempt source deposits as the only deposits in the account.  Other exempt sources include retirement, pension, railroad retirement, and child support.  Use of both wage and bank garnishments can be deemed unfair as 25% of paycheck can be taken and then all but $400.00 in the bank account. 

A real estate judgment lien can also filed with the clerk’s office in the resident county on all properties a debtor owns.  This lien last for 5 years and is then re-filed for another 5 years up to a maximum of 21 years.  These liens may not yield immediate funds and may not yield any if the property is foreclosed.  When the owner tries to sell the property, the lien will need to be satisfied for transfer of clear title.

The Praecipe can be used on license chattel, which would include autos, trucks, boats, farm equipment and the like. These assets are not usually a good source of satisfying debt because they are mobile and much more difficult to gain possession of. Also, the common use of auto leases means there are fewer vehicles actually owned by debtors.  A seized auto may also have less value that the amount owed on the vehicle.  

The Praecipe can also be used when an employer refuses to garnish the employee’s wages.  Action can be taken against the employer who will not comply. 

Debtor exams can also be used after judgments and they are filed with the courts.  If the taxpayer fails to appear, a warrant is issued.  Burke’s fees are about 25%, filing a lawsuit is $108.00, a wage garnishment is $40.00, a lien is $30.00 and interest is 4%.

 

Discussed Topics

Jim Neusser briefly covered a few topics on tax ordinances but will cover Return and Payment of Tax sections at the next meeting. 

Local ordinances need to state how S-Corporations are taxed.  They can be taxed as C-corporations, or as pass-through entities, taxed at the owner level.  Municipalities taxing S-Corp owners were to have twice taken the issue to the polls per ORC to determine if they can continue to tax the owner’s share in full.  If the issue did not pass, they would be limited to only taxing Ohio shares.  When S-Corp owners did not receive a W-2 on their companies showing profits on the K-1, wages can be determined per an estimate.

Lotteries will be more of an issue now that the casinos legislation passed in Ohio.  The counties will allocate the revenue to the municipalities.  Cities should check their ordinances to see if any deductible should be applied or if expenses will be allowed against income.  When winnings are paid out over multiple years, the income is applied in the year of the winnings, not over the years paid.  Professional gamblers who consider their winnings a business are permitted to reflect winnings on a schedule C with the associated expenses.  Professional gamblers must be granted the status by the IRS and verification of this status could be requested. 

Jim also provided an additional 12-day rule flowchart for reference.  Comparison with the SWOTA chart on the NWOTCA website is encouraged. 

 

Information Exchange

In the information exchange, some cities have instituted a trash fee for additional revenue.  Maumee is considering an entertainment tax. 

 

Next Meeting

The next meeting will be May 18th in Archbold instead of the previously scheduled May 11th.  This will enable more timely updates from the May 14th OML meeting.